Homeowners receiving a new flat in exchange for an old one during redevelopment won’t face income tax, rules Mumbai ITAT in key judgment.
Redeveloped Flats Not Taxable Under Section 56, Rules ITAT
In a significant ruling, the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has stated that homeowners receiving new flats in exchange for old ones under redevelopment agreements are not required to pay income tax under Section 56 of the Income Tax Act. This decision offers major relief to property owners involved in housing society redevelopment projects.
The ITAT bench, comprising members B.R. Baskaran and Sandeep Gosain, held that such exchanges should not be viewed as transfers of property for inadequate consideration. Instead, they are merely replacements of ownership rights and thus do not qualify as taxable income under “Income from Other Sources.”
Understanding Section 56(2)(x) and the Tribunal’s Reasoning
Typically, Section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 allows taxation of any immovable property received without or at a value below the stamp duty valuation—if the gap exceeds ₹50,000. However, the tribunal emphasized that this rule doesn’t apply when an individual gives up their flat in return for a redeveloped one, as it is not a case of acquiring undervalued property but rather a continuation of ownership in a new form.
This interpretation effectively removes the transaction from the purview of Section 56 and categorizes it, if anything, as a capital gains event. In such cases, tax relief can be claimed under Section 54 for reinvestment in a new property.
Case Study: Anil Dattaram Pitale vs. Income Tax Department
The judgment arose from the case of Anil Dattaram Pitale, who had purchased a flat in a cooperative housing society in 1997-98. Following the society’s redevelopment, he received a new flat in December 2017 as compensation for surrendering his original one.
The stamp duty value of the newly allotted flat was ₹25,17,700, while the indexed cost of the earlier flat stood at ₹5,43,040. The tax department treated the difference of ₹19,74,660 as income from other sources, leading to a tax demand. This view was also upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
However, when the matter reached the ITAT, the bench dismissed the earlier interpretations. It ruled that Section 56(2)(x) was incorrectly applied, and that this should be viewed as a capital gains scenario, potentially qualifying for exemption under Section 54. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reverse the tax addition.
Impact and Precedent for Redevelopment Projects
This ruling sets a noteworthy precedent for homeowners participating in redevelopment schemes across India, particularly in metropolitan areas like Mumbai where such projects are common. It clarifies that receiving a new flat in exchange for an old one during redevelopment does not trigger income tax under Section 56(2)(x), easing financial concerns for property owners.
The ITAT’s decision ensures legal clarity and aligns taxation principles with the practical realities of urban redevelopment.
Now You Can Follow Our Channel On WhatsApp!